Henry Kissinger: Optimist!

James Joyner | January 16, 2009

Henry Kissinger has been called many names over the years. But Atlantic Council president and CEO may have found a new one last night after the conclusion of Kissinger's Makins Lecture: Optimist.

To be sure, the venerable diplomat is still an old school Realist, insisting on judging foreign policy by inconvenient facts and pointing out that diplomacy requires more than sitting down to chat and that our preferences are not always achievable. Further, he believes our global political and economic institutions are "out of phase" and that we won't get out of the current crisis until we realign them.

At the systemic level, however, he's incredibly bullish. If we play our cards right, we are about to "enter an extraordinarily creative period."

For the first time in living memory, we have an international great power consensus on the major goals, albeit with differences in how to go about achieving them. With respect to the global financial crisis, "no major country believes they benefit from the crisis or deliberately undermining the international system." Further, the crisis is in at least one way a blessing: with resources shrinking, "no country believes it can solve its own problems" without international cooperation. This will force states to align their priorities with others, ultimately leading to necessary restructuring of the global system.

Other problem areas have the seeds of resolution, too.

He's "hopeful" about Iraq.

While he's pessimistic about our chances of achieving our goals in Afghanistan, he believes that "we can not avoid reassessing Afghanistan" in the light of what is possible; for a Realist, that counts as optimism.

As to our potential great power rivals, he believes both Russia and China have "an enormous appetite for dialog" and that we will come to a mutually beneficial accomodation.

Related Event:

Kissinger Delivers Atlantic Council's Annual Makins Lecture

James Joyner is managing editor of the Atlantic Council. Photo by Getty Images.

Trackback URL for this post:

http://www.acus.org/trackback/2709

Comments

Submitted by Dave Schuler on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 10:25.

For the first time in living memory, we have an international great power consensus on the major goals, albeit with differences in how to go about achieving them. With respect to the global financial crisis, "no major country believes they benefit from the crisis or deliberately undermining the international system." Further, the crisis is in at least one way a blessing: with resources shrinking, "no country believes it can solve its own problems" without international cooperation.

That might be right but I think it's an unsupportably rosy assessment. At best the Chinese are neutral on the international system. They're willing for us to bail them out of their current difficulties but wouldn't mind much if we shot ourselves in the foot while doing so.

Submitted by James Joyner on Fri, 01/16/2009 - 11:57.

Dave,

I think it's right in the purest sense that "the Chinese are neutral on the international system," in that they're not concerned about institutions per se. At the same time, however, it's very much in their interests that consumer states upon whom they depend for continued growth -- and, certainly, we're at or near the top of that list -- recover and continue to Buy Chinese.